Trevor Loudon's New Zeal blog has moved to

redirecting you there now

Monday, March 12, 2007

To Hillary With Love

US shirt company Those Shirts dont like Hilary-but then....


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Disgustingly right-wing, Republican, Bible bashing dogs really.

Flat Earth types (Mah would say "Hmmm.......Typical !"). Don't have the foggiest that there is intelligent and pulsing life beyond Palomino Drive, Tucson, and Crawford, Texas. For those overfrequent "vacations". Detox spells I reckon.

Bit like the blue-rinse who daily perambulate up and down St Heliers in their Burberry. Potentially vicious, snapping little chihuahua at foot. You seen them ? They're a hoot ! Blithely unaware of everything really.

But see a Samoan from GI and his handsome family (the new brown wave, like it or not) and they're on the line to Homeland Security right smart !

One day, brazenly sunning myself out east there I got spoken to by the cops. Why ? For my rebel-yell, "Bill Andersen !". All hell broke loose I can tell you. Civil Defence was out !

However, those T Shirts are rather funny. So I give them that. Nothing wrong with humour. Which is a thing you and your ilk might learn I reckon. "Specially M.

Anyway, take it you'd rather not see "the Hil'" moving back into 1600. Well, I wouldn't mind but I'll be barracking for Barack. Greatest country in the world gotta have a sane, unsullied person at the helm, not some contemptible little Vietnam-Times-Houdini-Chickenhawk like they got right now. He should be depatched back to TX to run yet another Daddy-funded corporation into the ground.

We all depend on America arresting its slide into calamitous self-destruction Trev. 'Cos we go down the gurgler with them in these globalistic times. Forget the commies, the world's greatest enemy at the moment is within. And damn they calls him Georgeous !

I mean, America is historically renowned for "Destroy It/Them To Save It/Them !"

It's a bleak outlook mate. You can do your part though. Wake up and smell the stench of that sick, rich white boy ! And the sinister Cheney. The real president some say.

Start proselytising for the world. Not for the effete while cultivating "cowboy" few, who'll kill us to meet their madness !

7:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

this morning is a pretty much rainy day, so after finished my job, I rather to stay home. Whenever there is such this horrible wheather I prefer to lay down on the cought, with internet or a travel catalogue, to think about my next trip and I would like a lot to make it an[/color] [url=]asia tour[/url][color=#9db]. Life over there is cheap, so I think to remain in Asia 4 weeks or more and visit as many country as I can. And damn I wanna eat a lot of tom yam soup. What a delicacy!

8:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you endorsing these slogans/T-shirts Trevor? Or just being "ironic"? Do you think calling a woman a "bitch" is funny/ironic? What would your female colleagues make of this sort of language? Why would you call either Clinton a "communist"? What exactly is it about Hillary (or Bill) Clinton's pro-war, anti-welfare, anti-immigrant policies that you consider left-wing?

5:18 PM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

Anon-I think they're funny. I don't know any colleagues who would be particularly offended-though to be honest I haven't asked.

Both Clintons have well documented communist links in their pasts-Hillary's more extensive and more recent, though Bill's were perhaps more significant.

Some of what Bill did, on welfare etc was good, but Chinese links to his 1996 campaign were dodgy to say the least.

I certainly don't relish the prospect of Hillary ever gaining significant power, let alone the presidency.

12:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With respect Trevor, you simply avoided my question. Obviously, you think they're funny. Nazis think that caricatures of Jews as hook-nosed, child-molesting bankers are funny. The point is, do you think it's acceptable to call a woman a "bitch"? Would you use that term to refer to Helen Clark, for example?

11:05 AM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

I have used a lot worse to describe Helen Clark in private.

The question is, what is appropriate in public.

That depeneds on the individual. I find it perfectly acceptable to describe Hillary Clinton as a "bitch" because I think that is being charitable to her.

That is not acceptable to some people and if they are offended, I suggest they don't read this blog.

I don't offend people simply for the sake of it, but I am into robust debate and calling a spade a spade.

That clear enough?

11:46 AM  
Blogger Just my opinion said...

Some people have no sense of humour and argue for the sake of it.

I wonder how much experience anon has with either Clinton, or has done his homework on them?

3:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is the big difference between public and private political comments Trevor?
If its good enough to whisper in the shithouse, why not shout it from the rooftops?
Or are you just a shy boy pacifist two faced pseudoliby donger?

Freedom Now

9:39 PM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

Pretty rich for an anonymous commentator "Freedom Now".

My point was merely that foul language isn't usually appropriate in a public forum.

If you think I aren't outspoken enough against the left, start your own hard-hitting blog and show me up for the wimp I am.

10:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is the United States in better shape after seven years of Bush than it was after eight years of Clinton? Hard to argue that it is.

1:19 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

well Trevor the sophistication of your arguments and ability to spell really says a lot about why ACT is a 1% party.
may you remain its deputy evermore, keep up the great work.

4:59 PM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

Anon 1- does disregard for Clinton necessarily imply support for Bush?

12:23 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home