Trevor Loudon's New Zeal blog has moved to

redirecting you there now

Tuesday, April 05, 2011

The Descent of Evil Over America

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

And thy face is Samantha Power... Should Obama win a second term in 2012, it is strongly rumored that Samantha Power will become our next Secretary of State with Hillary Clinton declining to serve another term. Clinton, a stalwart progressive/Marxist, was bad enough. Power, the wife of America's Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein, is an unapologetic anti-semite and a monster extreme. Evil has unfurled its vast wings over America and the darkness is threatening a rapid descent. If only the good die young, America's time may have come if this event comes to fruition. Conservatives must win the election in 2012 if America is to survive as we have always known it.

I hate to break it to everyone, but Glenn Beck was right once again. The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine raises it's malevolent countenance bearing a striking resemblance to Stephen King's horror laden thriller "It." A chilling smile of bowel-watering ferocity is bearing down on the State of Israel. Power famously summized the following:

"What we don’t need is some kind of early warning mechanism there, what we need is a willingness to put something on the line in helping the situation. Putting something on the line might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing — or investing, I think, more than sacrificing — billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel’s military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing the billions of dollars it would probably take, also, to support what will have to be a mammoth protection force, not of the old Rwanda kind, but a meaningful military presence. Because it seems to me at this stage (and this is true of actual genocides as well, and not just major human rights abuses, which were seen there), you have to go in as if you’re serious, you have to put something on the line.

Unfortunately, imposition of a solution on unwilling parties is dreadful. It’s a terrible thing to do, it’s fundamentally undemocratic. But, sadly, we don’t just have a democracy here either, we have a liberal democracy. There are certain sets of principles that guide our policy, or that are meant to, anyway. It’s essential that some set of principles becomes the benchmark, rather than a deference to [leaders] who are fundamentally politically destined to destroy the lives of their own people. And by that I mean what Tom Freidman has called “Sharafat.” I do think in that sense, both political leaders have been dreadfully irresponsible. And, unfortunately, it does require external intervention."
And long before the anointing of Power comes to pass, the UN has threatened to deem and pass a global decree for Palestine if Israel does not concede a state to them by September of this year. From the New York Times:
With revolutionary fervor sweeping the Middle East, Israel is under mounting pressure to make a far-reaching offer to the Palestinians or face a United Nations vote welcoming the State of Palestine as a member whose territory includes all of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.
It's like thunder and lightning as the New World Order roars to the forefront and overshadows God's chosen people. And in a test worthy of David and Goliath, Israel will fight once again for its survival and America finds herself on the wrong side. It would seem our progressive leaders have chosen to side with the darkness rising over the Middle East.



Blogger Lisa G in NZ said...

I can endure Glenn Beck, sometimes, and yes, within constraints of what FOX allows, he does good work ...

but WHY OH WHY didn't Mr. Beck take the golden opportunity to REALLY research the complely ILLEGAL usurper that is Barry Soetoro and invite Donald Trump on to discuss?

Only Donald gets to ask BC questions?

The answer already is out there: If Obama senior was the birth father, Obama junior does NOT qualify as a "natural born citizen".

BOTH PARENTS have to be America citizens = he is a usurper

... and NO the 14th amendment does NOT cover this

Did FOX news figure O'Reilly berating Donald and his clinging to a newspaper clip (which ANYONE could get) of birth - as "evidence" TheWon was born in Americaa?

Have you researched the usurper?

Why hasn't Beck?



4:38 PM  
Blogger Dave Posh said...

Very well written. My only suggestion is that the title should have been "The Decent of Evil Over America - part one in the series".

12:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Lisa, Glenn is waiting for the right moment to reveal Barrack Hussein Obama and his place of birth.

3:13 AM  
Blogger Cobra said...

Beck is sometimes wrong, like when he labeled Gert Wilders a fascist, despite the fact he interviewed him one year prior....
But, overall, Beck has done an exceptional work in exposing the dangerous agenda of this commie president/administration.

6:34 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lisa G mentioned the 14th Amendment. This is another reason obama is inelligible for the Presidency.

The 14th Amendment's purpose was to establish an ipso-facto (after-market) "federal" citizenship for the freed slaves (and future non-posterity minorities, as they could not be admitted to citizenship in any of the States (consistant with the "legal" definition of "nation"), where citizenship was originally found. The country was not founded for them, they were being adopted into it after-the-fact as a privilege.

The 14th amendment constitutionalized the Civil Rights Act of 1866 in which Congress confered statutory "civil rights" upon the "subjects" it had just created, which were intended to provide them with "statutory" equality to the Creator derived unalienable "natural" rights which applied to the founding generation and its "posterity".

The 14th Amendment applies only to minorities; the founding generation had "natural" rights that pre-dated government, they didn't need it. They already had unalienable rights, they didn't need "civil rights". This country was not founded upon "civil rights".

Immediately following the "natural born" citizenship clause is: no one but one who could have been a citizen of the United States AT THE TIME THE CONSTITUTION WAS ADOPTED is eligible for the Presidency.

There was no 14th Amendment AT THE TIME THE CONSTITUTION WAS ADOPTED, it wasn't ratified untill after the Civil War.

Obama is dependant entirely upon the 14th Amendment for his citizenship, he is a government created "subject" and could not have been a citizen in any of the States AT THE TIME THE CONSTITUTION WAS ADOPTED. He likly would have been a slave at that point in time.

For this reason as well, obama cannot lawfully be our President.

8:47 AM  
Blogger Redwood509 said...

This report is well founded but the odds that the "One" will be re-elected seem to be rather slim. Republicans are likely o keep their majority but perhaps own the Senate. In the event that he pulled a rabbit out of a hat, it is possible to see a "no confirmation" during the hearings. It is not a matter of being against Israel as much as she is not suited to be th eface of U.S diplomacy. More on her and why can be glenaed from earlier reports at and, NRO, pajama media.....

5:10 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home