Trevor Loudon's New Zeal blog has moved to

TrevorLoudon.com

redirecting you there now

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Mark My Words Readers, This is the Most Socialist US Government in Decades

Many Republicans and conservatives, dismayed at the Democratic party landslide in the mid term elections are looking for some small consolation.

There has been much talk of the "Blue Dog" Democrats, conservative Southern Democrats, who are Republicans in all but name.

Unfortunately, such talk is self delusional.

I quote from an excellent article on US website "In These Times"

Don’t buy all the crap coming from GOP talking-point memos or the blather from mainstream pundits. The midterm elections do not signal a move to the center. Yes, a few conservative Democrats were elected, but the big gainers were progressives. In particular, the Congressional Progressive Caucus is on the rise.


Who is this Congressional Progressive Caucus? What is their significance?

Democrats as a whole will benefit from controlling the House of Representatives, but yesterday’s victory bodes especially well for members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), a coalition of 63 left-leaning Democrats that includes Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

Indeed the CPC is poised to increase its ranks. In an unprecedented move this fall, CPC members—coming together under the newly formed Progressive Majority Project—pooled their money, time and staff to lend support to progressives running in 12 House races. Eight of those CPC-backed candidates won, which makes all this talk about conservative Democrats in the ascendancy a bunch of bunk. (In addition, two CPC members, Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), have moved on to the Senate.)


So what? How can a few dozen pinko Democrats have any serious influence on the government of the world's most powerful nation?

Though the CPC represents about a third of House Democrats, the caucus members hold ranking minority positions on half of the House’s 20 standing committees, including Conyers on the Judiciary Committee, Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) on the Education and the Workforce Committee, and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) on the Government Reform Committee.

As chairmen of those committees, CPC members will now be in a position to both promote progressive legislation and investigate administration wrongdoing. The assumption of committee chairmanships is one way the CPC is working to transform the group from the House’s largest caucus into its most powerful.


Democratic Congresswoman, Barbara Lee, from California, co-Chairs the Progressive Caucus. She has made it very clear that she and her colleagues intend to move quickly on their agenda.

“It is important to recognize that this was not just a vote against George Bush and the Republican Congress, it was a vote for a Democratic agenda that is rooted in progressive values.... In just the first 100 hours, we will be uniting behind Leader Pelosi to move a legislative agenda designed to address real issues that impact Americans.”

That agenda is already in place. These people know exactly what they want.

To build unity among the growing caucus, the CPC in May of last year hired former AFL-CIO official Bill Goold, its first full-time employee, as a policy coordinator. Five months later, the caucus drafted a new four-point “Progressive Promise,” a kind of Ten Commandments for progressives; the points centered around economic justice, civil rights, global peace and energy independence. A framework of general policy initiatives, such as raising the minimum wage and opposing media consolidation, is included.

And HR 676, introduced by Conyers and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), has become a rallying point for the CPC, labor unions, nurses and other activists. The proposal, which would establish universal health care, drew co-sponsorship from more than 70 representatives, was endorsed by as many labor unions and was the subject of rallies in dozens of U.S. cities this year.


The Progressive Caucus essentially functions as a socialist party inside the Democratic machine. It has direct links with some very radical organisations. Many of it's leading members would not get a security clearance to clean toilets at a military base, yet they hold some of the most important positions in the US government.

Over the next few days I will look at the CPC's origins and loyalties and profile some of its leading members.

6 Comments:

Blogger Heine said...

Thanks for this Trev, I must say I was fooled into the whole blue dog thing myself. I guess the best thing about US politics is that even the most aspirational of politicians get bogged down and stuck on issue that can kill some of their vigour :)

The American people will not allow any wholesale changes to any major policy, but I am sure the lefties will try anf tinker with what they can. If the GOP win the next election then I reckon this little grouping will peter out.

12:14 PM  
Blogger Tomás Estrada-Palma said...

Yes we are socialist, have been for a while and it looks like we'll continue to get more of the same. You see in America we have two parties because they make the mubarak election rules. One party spends our money on us hoping to make us be good while the other wants to spend our money making us do good. So if the left isn't right and the right isn't right - then what's left of our rights?

4:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bush was pretty socialist himself. America still has a number of protections on industry, and we all know how much of a spender he is. And he has increased the size of government.

8:16 AM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

While I have no sympathy for the socialism of the Democrats, guys, its pretty damn hard to support the out of control Republicans

I only hope that the Republicans can recapture some of the spirit they had in Reagan's time.

10:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"It's conservative lore that Reagan the icon cut taxes, while George H.W. Bush the renegade raised them. As Stockman recalls, "No one was authorized to talk about tax increases on Ronald Reagan's watch, no matter what kind of tax, no matter how justified it was." Yet raising taxes is exactly what Reagan did. He did not always instigate those hikes or agree to them willingly--but he signed off on them. One year after his massive tax cut, Reagan agreed to a tax increase to reduce the deficit that restored fully one-third of the previous year's reduction. (In a bizarre bit of self-deception, Reagan, who never came to terms with this episode of ideological apostasy, persuaded himself that the three-year, $100 billion tax hike--the largest since World War II--was actually "tax reform" that closed loopholes in his earlier cut and therefore didn't count as raising taxes.)

Faced with looming deficits, Reagan raised taxes again in 1983 with a gasoline tax and once more in 1984, this time by $50 billion over three years, mainly through closing tax loopholes for business. Despite the fact that such increases were anathema to conservatives--and probably cost Reagan's successor, George H.W. Bush, reelection--Reagan raised taxes a grand total of four times just between 1982-84."

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0301.green.html

8:44 AM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

You're quite right anon, that the Reagan promise never lived up to the dream.

Reagan ispired conservatives and many libertarians with his vision of smaller, constitutional government and lower taxes.

The reality never matched the rhetoric, but at least you thought Reagan actually believed what he said.

A 40% turnout in the recent mid terms, indicates to me that many conservatives and virtually all libertarians stayed home on voting day.

Bush seems to have no vision, certainly not one that would inspire me.

The Democrats do have some vision, a socialist vision, but a vision none the less.

Their people went to the polls, a lot of ours didn't.

10:37 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home