China Interested In Latin American Revolutionaries
From the People's Daily Online
Sao Paulo forum adopts resolution adhering to one-China policy
Parties and political organizations taking part in the 13th Sao Paulo forum agreed to adhere to the one-China policy, said a resolution passed at the end of the meeting on Sunday.
According to reports reaching here from San Salvador, capital of El Salvador, where the Sao Paulo forum was held, the representatives and observers of the forum supported China's efforts in realizing the reunification of its motherland and hoped China would achieve peaceful reunification as soon as possible.
Around 600 representatives of various parties and social groups from 33 countries attended the forum.
The International Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was also present at the forum as an observer.
Sao Paulo forum adopts resolution adhering to one-China policy
Parties and political organizations taking part in the 13th Sao Paulo forum agreed to adhere to the one-China policy, said a resolution passed at the end of the meeting on Sunday.
According to reports reaching here from San Salvador, capital of El Salvador, where the Sao Paulo forum was held, the representatives and observers of the forum supported China's efforts in realizing the reunification of its motherland and hoped China would achieve peaceful reunification as soon as possible.
Around 600 representatives of various parties and social groups from 33 countries attended the forum.
The International Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was also present at the forum as an observer.
posted by Trevor Loudon at
1/17/2007 09:02:00 PM
28 Comments:
Of course China is interested in these Communist revolutionary movements in Latin America. You should also try to find of a photo of Fidel Castro and Hu Jintao sitting side by side.
Or a photo of Don Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam right after the latter gassed the Kurds.
Cos we all know that Don Rumsfeld encouraged Saddam to do it , right anon?.
EXOCET
Anonymous, please cut the propaganda bullshit. How about you defending the monster Rumsfeld "supported" by not supporting his ouster from power?
Didn't stop him, exocet, or tell him off afterwards. Actually went to further their relationship. Sort of the exact opposite to what they should have done. Oh well, some people (such as yourself) will excuse anything.
"Actually went to further their relationship. Sort of the exact opposite to what they should have done. Oh well, some people (such as yourself) will excuse anything."
So now you suggest that America should have had close relations with Saddam? Gee, that doesn't make you go and defend a monster like that. Not!
America DID have close relations with Saddam, if you consider the overall context, the TIME. America resolved to resume a higher level of diplomatic relations - that's what Reagan's handwritten letter in Rumsfeld's pocket asked for.
AT A TIME WHEN BOTH REAGAN AND RUMSFELD KNEW SADDAM WAS GASSING THE KURDS - US CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE REPORT
So Saddam was further armed by America. Simple as. Could the disgrace be more plain, or the hypocrisy of Bush/Rumsfeld "democracy and freedom" homilies more palpable ?
No good coming back with "what about........" This is America, the vaunted leader and protector of democracy and freedom. If it won't walk the talk who the hell else will ?
Isn't this whole "debate" about how the world can become less dangerous. You guys sound like you want it to be more dangerous.
And a response which says - "Well it is......because of you know whom......." - amounts to a bit of a psychological concern. But that's your problem not mine.
"America DID have close relations with Saddam, if you consider the overall context, the TIME. America resolved to resume a higher level of diplomatic relations - that's what Reagan's handwritten letter in Rumsfeld's pocket asked for."
So why the hell are you so against removing Saddam? Are you not happy that such a monster is dead? Or are you just going to promote propaganda like before "steve the not-so-nice guy"?
"So Saddam was further armed by America. Simple as. Could the disgrace be more plain, or the hypocrisy of Bush/Rumsfeld "democracy and freedom" homilies more palpable ?"
More propaganda bullshit again "steve the not-so nice guy". Why the hell are you ignoring the Chirac-Saddam links that date back to the 1970's when Saddam was VP of Iraq? Along with French assistance of building Iraq's nuke facility that Israel bombed later? And how about Russia's reaction to Saddam's death? Hmm, sounds quite similar to your apologetic view to such a monster like Saddam.
"Isn't this whole "debate" about how the world can become less dangerous. You guys sound like you want it to be more dangerous."
You just love to lecture about what an "adult" you are during your sort of "debates". At the same time, you continue to promote bullshit propaganda and then call people who you don't like names or do other sort of childish antics.
You're a poor thing Mah. You never learn !
"You're a poor thing Mah. You never learn !"
Anonymous, please stop your bullshit propaganda. If the U.S. did "create" Saddam, why oppose intervention against him? Or why would someone like Ramsey Clark for that matter want to defend a U.S. "client" like Saddam?
You are so full of crap 'Steve'. The French and the Soviets had far more dealing with Saddam the the US ever did.
But of course any little handy stick to beat the US is OK right, who care about reality?
EXOCET
Well it's you guys who are the two percenters, not me. You guys just sit around playing tin soldiers all day without any regard for the simple realities of the world political dynamic, expecting the more balanced 98% to heed your dire, crackpot warnings about all and sundry.
And when they don't you get hoha.
Another litle laddie who one day may grow up !
But anyway, do you deny the Saddam/Rumsfeld number I described or would you rather not talk about that one ? Come on, be a man. Front the question.
"steve the not so nice guy",
If that photo of Saddam shaking Rumsfeld's hands were any remotely true to Saddam being a U.S. "client", why on Earth would someone like Ramsey Clark who is the head of International ANSWER, front for the Party of Socialism and Liberation and the head of International Action Center, front for the Worker's World Party defend the man?
Yea, Saddam pretty much seemed to be pro-American to me. Not!
Yeah, well you've given me Burke's World Communism, you know the name of every little rising starlet in that world.
But so what ! I didn't ask for a script ! What I hope you will eventually acknowledge as a mature person, is that your plans to right the world would destroy the world. There's always going to be the Left so stop pipe dreaming that it may one day not exist at all. It's like a fantastical dream ! You can't angrily mutter it out of existence or expunge it with blogsite text.
You, from your stuffy lounge with tin soldiers scattered all around, don't have the right to despatch the lives of millions just to meet "your" plan to protect the world from the Left and anything else not understood by you.
That's why I say grow up. You've got a lot to learn about human nature !
I never said Palestinian terrorists were "outnumbered" nor that the ABCs and XYZs of communism don't exist- bet you'd be really said if they didn't - nothing to rave about. Why don't you read properly before you react ? Does your singular fanaticism impede your faculties ?
What I've said throughout is that the Ten Lives For One Life policy of the Zionists who control the IDF is a murderous, deliberate, ongoing course of conduct. But if you do want to talk numbers I daresay a US supplied Starfighter over a refugee camp has the destructive power of many, many, many individuals.
So nut on all you like but the fact of Ten For One and the completely disproportionate use of firepower remains unchallenged by your voluble, angry screeching. Both aspects are palpable and undeniable.
What are those in Palestine for eons supposed to do ? Lie down to the lunatic from Crawford, Texas, the Chickenhawk, defer to the lofty, wahanui imperatives issuing forth from your lounge room, applaud it all ?
What would you do if you were them ? As a human being ? It is characteristic of the Holocaust Nazi that there are those humans who are not "as human" as themselves. A lesser grade of human who can be treated as the likes of you in your fantastical world view might please.
Time to chuck aside your tin soldiers Mah. They encourage you to present as an unintelligent, childish idiot.
"I never said Palestinian terrorists were "outnumbered" nor that the ABCs and XYZs of communism don't exist- bet you'd be really said if they didn't - nothing to rave about. Why don't you read properly before you react ? Does your singular fanaticism impede your faculties ?"
For god shake, read the book Red Horizons by Soviet-Romanian defecotr Ion Mihai Pacepa. The only one who seems to look childish here is someone like you "steve the not so nice guy". You can't handle the fact that you are a propagandist who will never see the light.
"What I've said throughout is that the Ten Lives For One Life policy of the Zionists who control the IDF is a murderous, deliberate, ongoing course of conduct. But if you do want to talk numbers I daresay a US supplied Starfighter over a refugee camp has the destructive power of many, many, many individuals."
So let me get this straight, you also think it was justified for Palestinian terrorists to go and murder Israeli atheletes in a terror attack known as Black September along with attempting to ouster the Jordanian regime?
"So nut on all you like but the fact of Ten For One and the completely disproportionate use of firepower remains unchallenged by your voluble, angry screeching. Both aspects are palpable and undeniable."
I don't see you going and defend the Tibetian people. They have been oppressed by the Chinese government. But wait, why are there no reports of them blowing themselves up in buses in Beijing or in Shanghai or other major Chinese cities? Like the "poor" Palestinians do? Hmm? You simply "care" about oppressed victims whenever those supposedly oppressed end up killing the allege oppressees. Typical.
"What are those in Palestine for eons supposed to do ? Lie down to the lunatic from Crawford, Texas, the Chickenhawk, defer to the lofty, wahanui imperatives issuing forth from your lounge room, applaud it all ?"
Oh fuck off (pardon my language), you're so obsessed with hatred for President Bush? I am no longer supporting the man because of reports of U.S. allowing aid to head to Fatah via Egypt. But oh wait, the Palestinians are "poor", who cares that their leaders like Arafat are corrupt, stole international aid for himself and then blame Israel for the Palestinians' plight? Hmm?
"What would you do if you were them ? As a human being ? It is characteristic of the Holocaust Nazi that there are those humans who are not "as human" as themselves. A lesser grade of human who can be treated as the likes of you in your fantastical world view might please."
Hmm, I don't see the same outrage you have in Darfur or in Tibet. What should I view the Palestinians being radicalized? How their humanity is being erased away by PLO and other terror propagandists into hating Jews, blowing up innocent men, women and children and being taught to learn hate? How about Palestinians being able to retain their humanity back by not giving into bullshit like you are that's radicalizing them into hating Israelis?
"Time to chuck aside your tin soldiers Mah. They encourage you to present as an unintelligent, childish idiot."
I'm sorry, but I'm not the one wearing it. You seem to be the one if you always believe that Israel and/or America are the "greatest sources" of evil in the world. You're just trying to find an American "Fascist" and Israeli "Nazi" under everybody's beds? Are you not? Strange how you are acting like an anti-Semitic version of McCarthy and an anti-American one as well.
"steve the not so nice guy",
This is another reason why you support terrorism against Israel:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Resistance_Committees
Take a look at the crimes you are being so apologetic to.
The terror group is known as the Popular Resistance Committees.
Sorry mate, but at the moment your (several) responses are only underlining my point: childish and can't hack it when pulled from dream world.
And there's a sort of a rude, "poke-your-tongue out" way of contributing to the debate so-called.
It's no good humphing "Typical.." all the time. There are millions and millions and millions of people just like me who politically aren't too far away from centre, and who are appalled by the US Iraq War and have absolutely no respect for Bush/Rumsfeld et al.
So, in your book these millions who don't think in your extremes are expressing felicity with every foul dictator you know about. And you're cantankerous with and being me when I was 14.
That's what makes me call you a child. You don't own what goes on in my head or in the heads of the millions and millions. So stop trying to tell the 98% they're mongrels when they don't agree with your near fanatical line.
Not supporting Bush anymore ? Well done ! Best decision you've made in, mmmm, let me see, 14 years ?
So, when should the boys be back home Mah, you know, what with you not supporting Bush now and all that.......You'd be one for a quick withdrawal wouldn't ya ?
I would like to add another thing (pardon my language in advance), but "steve the not so nice guy", your type is typical among the far left circles who love to deny there's an international Communist movement even when Communist parties like the Communist Party USA or the Communist Party of Britain take in your talking points on how President Bush is a "fascist" and a "warmonger" and a "chickenhawk".
While you bury your head in the sand, you continue to promote propaganda that's already disproven to be disinformation. You prove that you are an uneducated twit who knows no knowledge of history of the Soviet KGB nor about the warnings and memoirs of its major defectors. You are worthless and should hang yourself in shame if you have any rational left in your mind. But I see that you don't and you would continue to promote far left propaganda and garbage that leads to nothing.
Only to prove that you are psychotic and mentally ill when it comes to debating. Again, I pardon my language in this post, but I'm just going to have to put my foot down on such nonsense that's coming out from "steve the not so nice guy".
All this whole carry on proves Mah is that you're a fanatical little git who can't see that I'm piss taking and have been all along. You do put yourself up for it with your screeching !
Grow up laddie. Stop taking yourself so bloody seriously. Get a life, step out from the "War Room" of your little lounge and go plant some potatoes or something.
You're an embarrassment !
Ka Kite
And enough of your pretensions to "Oxford Union" debating skills ! You're only marginally less inept than The Chickenhawk.
A lunatic fringe, far-right wing screecher. Nothing more !
"And enough of your pretensions to "Oxford Union" debating skills ! You're only marginally less inept than The Chickenhawk."
I didn't see you referring to President Clinton about being a "chickenhawk" when he was bombing Yugoslavia at the same time was quite involved in the anti-war protests against Vietnam.
"A lunatic fringe, far-right wing screecher. Nothing more !"
Me far right? Says the person who promotes anti-American/anti-Israel bullshit propaganda. I guess anyone who is pro-American and pro-Israel and anti-Communist is considered "far right", right?
hannah montana picture
All three of the erectile dysfunction drugs (Viagra, Levitra and Cialis)
are similar in action. They block an enzyme that causes an erection
to go flaccid. Although these drugs are similar in action, their dose,
onset of action time and duration of action differ.
pharmacy online cialis pharmacy online cialis
pharmacy online generic levitra pharmacy online generic levitra
pharmacy online viagra pharmacy online viagra
CAVERTA is a tablet used to treat erectile dysfunction (impotence) in men. It can help men who have erectile dysfunction get and sustain an erection when they are sexually excited.
pharmacy online caverta
Kamagra (Sildenafil Citrate) is a treatment for erectile dysfunction. Kamagra is generic viagra and is used for the treatment of impotence / erectile dysfunction. It comes in three different forms: kamagra jelly, kamagra tablets and chewable kamagra.
pharmacy online kamagra
pharmacy online Kamagra Oral Jelly
pharmacy online pharmacy online
Good web...
rx pharmacy
buy viagra
nice web...
Propecia
How Propecia works
Propecia precautions
Propecia instructions
Propecia side effects
Hair loss guide
Hair care handbook
Hair disorders
Hair loss articles
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home