Senior Russian Military Official Warns US Over Iran
From Novosti
MOSCOW, April 3 Washington needs to think twice before launching a military campaign against Tehran as such an attack would have global implications, a senior Russian military official said Tuesday.
Yury Baluyevsky, the head of the armed forces' General Staff, said: "Inflicting damage on Iran's military and industrial potential might be realistic, but winning [the war] is unachievable - its reverberations would be heard across the world."
Baluyevsky said that when making a decision on Iran, U.S. leaders should bear in mind the negative experience in other countries of the region.
"Our strategic partners have already got bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq," he said.
He warned that if the U.S. goes to war with Iran as well, the world may see America decline as the world's "mightiest and most powerful state."
The U.S. Administration sees Iran as a "rogue state" belonging to what President George W. Bush has termed "an axis of evil," and is determined to stop the Islamic Republic - diplomatically or otherwise - from obtaining a nuclear weapon. It now plans to deploy a national missile defense shield in Central Europe, which it says will help protect its own security and that of its European allies against potential missile strikes from Iran, suspected by the West of pursuing a covert nuclear weapons program.
Hat Tip Once Upon a Time in the West
If you cut through the diplomatic language, this is a pretty blunt message. Back off Bush, or risk disaster.
Bush is right about Iran being part of the "axis of evil". What he doesn't say, but should, is that Iran would not be so belligerent without Russian and Chinese backing.
I hate the charade, whereby the US condemns Iran, North Korea etc, but pretends that their puppet masters, the Russian and Chinese governments are our friends.
That's why I'm no Bush fan. He should have the courage to name and confront the real enemy-like reagan at least tried to do.
Note that Baluyevsky describes the US as "our strategic partner".
A touch of sarcasm perhaps?
MOSCOW, April 3 Washington needs to think twice before launching a military campaign against Tehran as such an attack would have global implications, a senior Russian military official said Tuesday.
Yury Baluyevsky, the head of the armed forces' General Staff, said: "Inflicting damage on Iran's military and industrial potential might be realistic, but winning [the war] is unachievable - its reverberations would be heard across the world."
Baluyevsky said that when making a decision on Iran, U.S. leaders should bear in mind the negative experience in other countries of the region.
"Our strategic partners have already got bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq," he said.
He warned that if the U.S. goes to war with Iran as well, the world may see America decline as the world's "mightiest and most powerful state."
The U.S. Administration sees Iran as a "rogue state" belonging to what President George W. Bush has termed "an axis of evil," and is determined to stop the Islamic Republic - diplomatically or otherwise - from obtaining a nuclear weapon. It now plans to deploy a national missile defense shield in Central Europe, which it says will help protect its own security and that of its European allies against potential missile strikes from Iran, suspected by the West of pursuing a covert nuclear weapons program.
Hat Tip Once Upon a Time in the West
If you cut through the diplomatic language, this is a pretty blunt message. Back off Bush, or risk disaster.
Bush is right about Iran being part of the "axis of evil". What he doesn't say, but should, is that Iran would not be so belligerent without Russian and Chinese backing.
I hate the charade, whereby the US condemns Iran, North Korea etc, but pretends that their puppet masters, the Russian and Chinese governments are our friends.
That's why I'm no Bush fan. He should have the courage to name and confront the real enemy-like reagan at least tried to do.
Note that Baluyevsky describes the US as "our strategic partner".
A touch of sarcasm perhaps?
posted by Trevor Loudon at
4/04/2007 10:44:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home