Trevor Loudon's New Zeal blog has moved to

TrevorLoudon.com

redirecting you there now

Thursday, October 14, 2010

BUSTED! Conyers Meets With Marxists - How Democrat Politics REALLY Works

This may be one of the most important articles New Zeal has ever posted. Please read it. Digest it. Act on it.

This post proves a point I have long made: that Democratic Congressmen are willing to collude with marxists in order to promote socialist legislation and to influence the political direction of the United States.

This is how the modern Democratic Party actually works - in partnership (often junior partnership, at that) with hard core marxists.

Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D MI), chair of the powerful House Judiciary Committee has been caught on tape, meeting with members of the U.S.'s largest marxist organization Democratic Socialists of America.

The tape clearly shows Conyers treating the marxists as friends. He continually refers to the gathering as "we", as he urges the comrades to rally behind his "beloved 44th president", Barack Obama.

The tape, posted on the D.S.A. Vimeo site, was filmed before the recent One Nation Rally in Washington DC, and shows Conyers speaking to a meeting of D.S.A. members in what appears to be an hotel room.

The website clearly states that this is a D.S.A. meeting and Conyers is introduced to the gathering by D.S.A. National director Frank Llewellyn. Prominent Boston D.S.A. member David Duhalde appears on the right, behind Llewellyn, wearing a beard, black T shirt and a cap.




In the first few seconds, Conyers is introduced by Frank Llewellyn as the "only congressman endorsed by Martin Luther King".

Llewellyn then notes Conyers' "long support for HR 676, the single payer Bill that this organization [D.S.A.] has long supported".

Quentin Young, Barack Obama

D.S.A. has indeed "long supported HR 676", which sprang from the "single payer" health care movement midwived by Chicago physician and D.S.A. member Quentin Young - a close personal friend of both John Conyers and President Barack Obama.

At about 34 seconds Llewellyn states, "many might not know that John is in the process of introducing sweeping legislation to address the jobs crisis - which is certainly one of the most important crises we face and one of the reasons why we're all here today."

At 60 seconds Conyers starts talking, addressing Frank Llewellyn by name and then says,
"Its good to know that a lot of my Michigan and Detroit and Grosse Point people are here. David Green, and Dave and Herman and probably others."
David Green is a leader of both Michigan and national D.S.A. Green visited Cuba in 2009 and proved his marxism with this statement in the Spring 2007 issue of D.S.A.'s Democratic Left.
"What distinguishes socialists from other progressives is the theory of surplus value. According to Marx, the secret of surplus value is that workers are a source of more value than they receive in wages. The capitalist is able to capture surplus value through his ownership of the means of production, his right to purchase labor as a commodity, his control over the production process, and his ownership of the final product. Surplus value is the measure of capital’s exploitation of labor

Our goal as socialists is to abolish private ownership of the means of production. Our immediate task is to limit the capitalist class’s prerogatives in the workplace...

In the short run we must at least minimize the degree of exploitation of workers by capitalists. We can accomplish this by promoting full employment policies, passing local living wage laws, but most of all by increasing the union movement’s power...

The Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) provides an excellent organizing tool (i.e., tactic) through which we can pursue our socialist strategy while simultaneously engaging the broader electorate on an issue of economic populism.
This is one of John Conyers' "people". Coincidentally Conyers is also a big fan of the EFCA.

After a "new agey" rave about the "oneness" of everything (cut out of this video), Conyers thanks the gathering for coming to the march and at 1:30 minutes goes on to say:
"This is an important event, that we don't doubt will be played down and misinterpreted by the corporate media...We understand the significance of it. We know that when unions, political ideology, clergy, labor, civil rights come together... and just people that are progressive enough to see in this one World concept, that we're all in this together, it makes certain things easy to understand where we're coming from."
At 2:25 minutes, Conyers talks about "peace" and Dennis Kucinich.
"Overriding it all is the quest for peace in the world...and I am firmly supporting Congressman Dennis Kucinich's measure that would make a Department of Peace in the United States Federal government." (applause)
John Conyers was once an affiliate of the Soviet front World Peace Council. Like Kucinich, Conyers also has a long history with the Communist Party USA, which has consistently advocated such measures.


At 4:20 minutes, Conyers moves on to the "question of my beloved 44th president of the United States."

Conyers criticizes America's war in Afghanistan and how "we" need to "make it clear to him, through all the usual means of communication, including pickets and protests....there probably isn't anybody above the 10th grade who doesnt know that you cannot win a war in Afghanistan." (laughter).

At 7:35 minutes Conyers says of Obama;
"I respect him, I support him... I say that all against the backdrop, of the fact that in 2012, there is a highly organized effort to make sure that he is a one term president.

This started even before he was sworn in. It's grown... I only mention the Tea Party, because it is small and dismissible, but there are much more serious and affluent sources behind this effort to interfere with a re-election campaign of Obama... I've got to ensure he is re-elected 2 years from now. That calls for some balancing, but not a whole lot from where I stand."
At 6.10 minutes Conyers goes on to deal with how those assembled need to help Obama.
"I see that us making him more cooperative with our plans is going to strengthen him and not weaken him... (applause) And to have this press secretary of his denouncing the left is an automatically dismissible act, if I were president...

The whole point is that, trashing progressives and the left, and at the same time watching your ratings go down - gee... what's so difficult about figuring that out?... Whose job do you think it is to get him straightened out and get him on the right track? Ours! Ours!"
(applause)
D.S.A. has tried to publicly distance itself from Obama in recent times, though they have a twenty seven year history with the President. Even Conyers has publicly criticized the President.

Clearly, John Conyers understands he is among friends, who are just as pro-Obama as he is. In private, Conyers and D.S.A. are right behind their man.

Like Obama, John Conyers has a long history with D.S.A.
  • In 2003 John Conyers was a keynote speaker at the D.S.A. national conference in Detroit - with 2008 Obama Black Advisory Council member Cornel West and the first journalist to promote obama on the national stage, the Washington Post's Harold Meyerson.
  • In 2005 D.S.A'.s Democratic Left -Spring edition, called "Congressman John Conyers (a key D.S.A. ally in Congress)..."
--------------------------------------------
The real secret of contemporary U.S. Politics is this:

Under today's Democratic Party, much of the legislation they push for is not made by Democrats. It is actually formulated by organizations close to D.S.A. and the Communist Party. It is then infiltrated into Congress by socialist sympathizers like John Conyers and his comrades, in the more than eighty strong, D.S.A. co-founded Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Socialized health care, the grossly mis-named Employee Free Choice Act, the current push to "normalize" relations with Cuba, even the campaign for a national holiday in honor of D.S.A. and the Communist Party's best friend Cesar Chavez, are all communist/socialist initiatives.

If this sounds far fetched, remember that in most U.S. states the Democratic Party is almost totally dependent on labor unions for manpower and money.

Since D.S.A. member John Sweeney became president of the AFL-CIO in 1995, the once anti-communist U.S. labor movement has come under near complete marxist control.


Barack Obama, John Sweeney

He who pays the piper, calls the tune.

The Democrats simply put a "respectable" face on policies originated by tiny, but hugely influential marxist sects.

Think of it this way. Just as the Mafia once used "respectable" front-men to control Las Vegas casinos, the marxists use "respectable" Democrats, kept in line with labor union "muscle" to control your Houses of Congress.

That's how it works America.

If you don't start throwing the Democrats out of office come November, your children may inherit a country permanently ruled by these people.

14 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It will take God and an absolute miracle to save us now. My heart is absolutely broken over the state of our union.

Most will not believe they can't stop them, but I've researched these people enough to know, without military intervention (which probably won't happen, because it is also infiltrated), we are doomed.

9:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I fear we are heading toward an unstoppable civil war.

The people who want to destroy this country have been planning this for decades and have all of their baskets in a row.

Obama made it clear that he would be ruling by executive order, no matter who won the election. By the time the new congress is sworn in, it will be too late. That's why the elections don't scare them.

9:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The criminals will not give up without a fight and neither will the patriots.

These are the times that try the hearts and souls of men.

9:20 PM  
Blogger Brianroy said...

The best legal and peaceful solution has been resisted by a coordinated effort and anti-US Republic insanity by leaders in both the Democratic and Republican Parties, and the Media. Without a US Citizen Father, Barack Obama does not meet the US Constitutional definition of a "Natural Born Citizen" of the United States. That is what US Supreme Court Case Law tells us. Instead, they hang on something a single Quaker lawyer wrote in a personal opinion capacity in the 1800s and an ignored by the US Supreme Court District case reinterpretive spin on Perkins v. Elg, (Liacakos v. Kennedy), a spin REFUSED by the US Supreme Court in subsequent cases mentioning their dilemma over the NBC issue each and every time over the next 19 years to 1980 (by which time Barack was no longer under 18), and refuse to allow "birthers" to demand what the US Constitution demands...that Obama prove he is qualified under Constitutional Law that he had a US Citizen Father at the time of birth (Bute v. Illinois 333 US 640 @ 653; Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53, Oral Arguments - Ruth Bader-Ginsberg's comments that from the founding of the Constitution to 6 decades after the 14th Amendment it was the FATHER Only who passed on US Citizenship and infers that only in 1934 the mother was added, and @ 54 and 62...providing hospital birth records with WITNESSES TO THE BIRTH). In other words, it is impossible under the US Constitution to claim that a jus soli birth without a paternal citizen jus sanguinis birth can make anyone a US Natural Born Citizen under existing law when Obama was born. He was and is a usurper of the Office of the US Presidency, and every bill and treaty he has ever signed can be negated because of that Legal Fact.

I really wish you and others also seriously examine the US Constitutional Natural Born Citizen caluse topic, check into it in depth, and when persuaded, post about it as well. Thank you kindly for all you have done and are doing in your research and blogs. Peace.

11:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

All -- military intervention won't work. In 1776, we the people had the arms that the British Army had. That's no longer true -- though they still will try to take away our Second Amendment Rights.

But Whittaker Chambers I think hints at the key to the fight in his book "Witness." He believed that the Marxists, the Communists, would "win" in this country. But he also knew that Communists, true Marxists, devote their entire lives, sacrificially, to their cause. It is evil, but it is, in a sense, a mission of spiritual proportions.

Chambers contended that conservatives alone could not defeat the Marxists. It will take conservatives who are rooted in a sacrificial, God-centered love of individual liberty and responsibility who might be able to take them on. He said that if you weren't a devoted counter-revolutionary, then you would have to be counted as a revolutionary -- aka Communist -- because even if you weren't actively working for them, they would use you like a tool for their purposes.

That, my dear friends who are heartbroken at the demise of our Constitution, has been happening for decades upon decades in our nation and throughout the world.

I have been used as a tool for revolution -- and I wasn't even aware of it. My sons, my sisters are being used BECAUSE they aren't aware of it.

We mustn't give up -- even if we have little hope -- because the alternative is too appalling for words.

Thank Heaven for Trevor Loudon. Please help to support his work financially. I've sent a little -- and will send more next month -- Lord willing.

We're struggling here, and each month gets a bit worse. But Obama is shutting down our sources of energy here in the US. The EPA has shut down the San Joaquin Valley -- one of the breadbaskets of our country -- and turned it into a dust bowl. They now are trying to regulate "dust" on all farms. A man in GA was fined $5000 for growing vegetables on his own land and giving some of them away to his neighbors. If we don't vote them out this Nov. 2nd, I don't know how our Republic survives.

I pray that even O's use of the Executive Order to RULE this country cannot override a new House of Representatives. But the Courts have already been infiltrated, so I'm not sure.

But I have a small measure of hope that truth can indeed prevail in a land where some of us, perhaps most of us, still treasure "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," rights with which we are endowed inalienably by our CREATOR.

2:04 AM  
Anonymous Cletus T Lee said...

What fucking right does an elected official have to meet with American citizens and voters? He should only meet with Big Business lobbyists and the Christian Right groups!

5:53 AM  
Blogger VoxPopuli said...

I fear it is too late - and the mid-term elections - while a necessity - will only relieve pressure. We will not gain enough seats to override a Presidential veto. This won't allow the new, non-politically savvy patriots that we will elect to do anything other than stop the financial hemorrhaging. Thus "We the people" will have committed to a strategy that will require even MORE energy to make the difference. We will have expended extraordinary energy - to only achieve the average. I do not think my brothers have the fervor and spiritual commitment required for this fight. The American will to fight has been sapped by generations of committed home-grown enemies. We do not know who we are anymore. I feel this fight will simply be. A " bridge too far" for most of my brothers. I fear only one thing can cause us to reset - loss of that which hold most dear - Liberty.

I pray I am wrong, but we have become a spiritually bankrupt nation - and without our spirit we won't endure a protracted fight.

I have a single hope - that there will be a third "Great Awakening"...that revival renews our spirit and we again determine our course to be set on Christ...as a nation...but a quick study of history shows that church growth occurs during times of persecution.

I am concerned - I do not see a bright future for myself and my countrymen, I WILL work to avoid calamity - but nothing short of spiritual revival will save America now.

We are in your hands o mighty God...

Vox

7:33 AM  
Blogger Cobra said...

As a political refugee from Eastern Europe I am very sad to see how commies are subverting our country, but also I know that there is hope.
Commies eat each other, and the population gets "educated" about what marxism is in the process.
And, given our American freedom yearning, that will prove terminal for the commies.
It will be a very tough period ahead, but we will be victorious.
Trust me.
Even the USSR-the commie "heaven" reformed...

8:43 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

DSA has 70 democratic members of congress, which now all makes sense for the mess we are in. They're not progressives, they're Commies.

Marx was wrong about true value of goods coming solely from labor. It also takes capital to build a factory, ideas for a product, and innovations and a business plan to execute competitively.

The DSA guy says labor should take (steal) the means of production. Why don't they just make one instead?

Chavez and Castro ran off everything but the labor, and they still can't make it work with the free stuff they stole. They repress and kill the people that point out things aren't working to keep the lie alive. They're ignorant liars interested in power and devolution of society so they can prey upon it.

Their people are suffering and leaving. Proof they are wrong.
.

6:56 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Good lord! And I can remember when the left called Reagan a dumb old fool.

Of course, 81 year-old Conyers, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has been in the news lately for a number of stupid statements. The best one being:

"I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read the bill.' What good is reading the bill if it's a thousand pages and you don't have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?"

And people wonder why the American voters are angry in the 2010 elections?

7:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

vote him out with the rest of them

9:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is always as many of us suspected all along. Starting with the assassinations in the 60's, and Ted Kennedy's rabid socialism. Why did it take 3 decades or more to get to the smoking gun. These smoking guns have been out there for decades, but lack of true journalism blocked these disclosures. Think of the lives, resources and pain that could have been saved if these activities had been exposed in the 70's and 80's. Many, many people had knowledge and now have blood on their hands.

6:14 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes lets worry about like minded people talking to each other. While the BANKSTERS and Wall Street goons rob us blind.
GET OFF the false left right paradigm pot!It is a fabricated disaster, engineered.And EVERYTHING else is a distraction. pooh for falling for it!

3:56 AM  
Anonymous JeffBrodhead said...

Many of these old-fart Progressive idiots have reached the age, where 2 years is a long, long, long time.

1:05 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home