Trevor Loudon's New Zeal blog has moved to

TrevorLoudon.com

redirecting you there now

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Eco-Terrorists Up the Ante

The Japanes say that the Robert Hunter rammed them. The eco-terrorists (sorry, I mean...uh..concerned environmentalists) say that the Japanese rammed them.


From Indymedia

The Sea Shepherd ship, Robert Hunter, has been holed in its starboard bow, and its port stern section above the waterline, during a collision with the whale spotter ship Kaiko Maru , according to Sea Shepherd's president Paul Watson. No injuries have been incurred by crew on both ships, and neither ship is in danger of sinking.

The Kaiku Maru (in foreground) approaches the Farley Mowat (Photo: Sea Shepherd)Exact details of the collision are still confusing. It appears the two Sea Shepherd ships caught the Kaiko Maru chasing a pod of whales near the Balleny Islands in Antarctica, south of New Zealand. Attempts were made by Sea Shepherd activists to disable the propellor of the Kaiko Maru, it appears with some success. Sea Shepherd say on their website "At one point during the confrontation, the Kaiko Maru turned to starboard and struck the Robert Hunter." According to Dr Hiroshi Hatanaka from the ICR on their website "The Robert Hunter rammed the Kaiko Maru."

"Sea Shepherd threw smoke pots onto the Kaiko Maru and released ropes and nets to entangle her screw. Its propeller has been damaged by them. The vessel is stranded at the moment and has already put out several distress calls." said Dr Hiroshi Hatanaka, the Director General of the Institute of Cetacean Research on the ICR website.

After the collision between the Robert Hunter and Kaiko Maru, the Japanese vessel was effectively blockaded against sea ice.

The Japanese vessel issued a maritime distress call saying that it was under attack and in immediate danger. According to the Sea Shepherd website "Sea Shepherd acknowledged this distress signal, but they Japanese vessel refused to say what distress they were in."

The Greenpeace ship also responded to the distress call, offering immediate assistance, heading at full speed to their position. According to Dave on the Greenpeace weblog "According to the Rescue Coordination Centre of New Zealand, first reports stated the Kaiko Maru was 'under attack.' Later reports claimed a collision between the Sea Shepherd vessel Robert Hunter and the Kaiko Maru, with the Robert Hunter receiving a hole in the hull above the water line and the Kaiko Maru suffering unspecified damage to its propeller."

"At approximately 18.15, the Rescue Coordination Centre of New Zealand requested that the Esperanza 'stand down'. We informed the Rescue Centre that we would remain within VHF range in case assistance was needed. At 20:15 we received what's known as a 'Seelonce Feenee', which means that the distress call is now over." concluded Dave from Greenpeace.

From a report on stuff.co.nz, Paul Watson said the Robert Hunter and the Farley Mowat had decided to confront the Kaiko Maru about 4pm (New Zealand time) as it chased a pod of whales.

"We scared the whales off. Both the Robert Hunter and the Kaiko Maru were stopped by the ice, but the Kaiko Maru backed up and it collided with the Robert Hunter. We've got a 1m gash in the hull, but it's above the water," he said.

"Then both vessels got under way, but the Kaiko Maru side-swiped the Robert Hunter to push it into the ice – that bent four beams on the inner hull. After that, they put out a distress signal.

"The Japanese are claiming they are in imminent and immediate danger. I don't know why – they hit us. They're down here trying to promote themselves as the victims.

"We have six cameras down here, we videotaped the incident. We can show who hit who."
said Paul Watson.

Both Sea Shepherd ships have been away from port for several weeks and are running low on fuel. Captain Watson said "We're only probably good for the next few days,"

According to a report in The Age newspaper Captain Watson warned that unless anti-whaling governments such as Australia took stronger action, he might try to ram the stern of the Nisshin Maru.

"Do whale defenders have to die down here for the world to notice and take action against the criminal activities of the Japanese whalers?" he said. "For this reason it has been decided to stop the operations of the Japanese floating slaughterhouse, the Nisshin Maru, by ramming one of the ships up the slipway of that foul, sadistic piece of killing machinery." he told a reporter for the Age.

Captain Watson has appealed to the Australian Government to enforce its territorial waters in the Antarctic against whaling, just as it has enforced laws against fish poaching in its territorial waters.

Both Sea Shepherd vessels do not have any current registration from a State, and have been labelled as 'pirate ships'. Japan has pressured both the UK and Belize to cancel maritime registration of the two Sea Shepherd vessels.

19 Comments:

Blogger mah29001 said...

No surprise there about the Marxist orientated environmental movement being quite involved in sabotage. I wonder where are these people in other parts of the globe.

Where are they protesting Cuba for having an offshore oil drilling?

11:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Act should be calling for the internment of all these people and a Air NZ strike on their ship.

1:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

marxists? sea shepherd? ha ha even Trevor cant link SSCS to marxsim

1:39 PM  
Blogger Murray said...

They haven't been "labeled" anything Trevor, an unregistered vessel that engages merchant ships on the high seas has a legal description. Pirate.

And if the RNZN doesn't get down there and invite them to drop by the nearest port and hand over their ships then we can expect the Japanese to do it.

11:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

39 39 friend meeting new s s single

2:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Two bombs is all it'd take. The Government should show some resolve, but what can you expect from a communist government like NZ's?

6:56 AM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

While emotionally I agree with you anon-but we must base our decisions on reason mustn't we?

10:57 PM  
Blogger Sam Buchanan said...

Why do you use the term 'terrorists' , Trev?

'Saboteurs', 'Pirates' etc. may be justified, but where is the terrorism? There's no suggestion that the Sea Shepherd are out to kill anyone, they haven't tried to bomb Tokyo or launch random attacks on Japanese. So what makes them terrorists (you not liking them isn't a reason)?

10:30 AM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

Sam

Chambers English Dict.

Terrorism-an organised system of intimidation esp-for political ends.

Sums it up well I think

7:32 PM  
Anonymous Steve Nice Guy Northland said...

Isn't it sweet how our dear old No Brains Molesting His Tin Soldiers On The Bremworth Mah is in a constant state of "No Surprise" about everything ? What a dull life he must have in his fantasy land of "Supreme Debate" ?

Truly, he's never, ever surprised and he tells us all the time, usually as a first post. Grow up Mah My Boy ! Your wife or partner or same sex companion must have a very boring time. You're never surprised, tapping away forever at that keyboard.

Gosh, I don't know ? Maybe you'll be surprised at the evidence of a possibility that John Key once started reading "Das Kapital". My God, the sky's fallen in !

11:54 PM  
Anonymous Steve Nice Guy Northland said...

Trev, get real, you guys ain't got the balls to do anything real but what you are about is to murder any concept of reality, of balance, of proportion, of rationality.

I mean, that increasingly Thatcheresque Helen Clark is a communist according to you guys. Well forgive me !

So what do you do ? Pontificate from your lounge rooms, tapping away at the plastic. Spreading the nutcase 2% word with all sorts of incredible prescriptions for every other bugger.

Look at your brother Mah for example. A not very intelligent or literate man and you know that to be the fact. Spewing hatred across cyberspace. Completely lacking humanity judging by his fantastic "Final Solutions" to everything and everyone. That's why I call him a Holocaust Nazi being Jewish and a fascist at the same time.

What is biting you guys balls ? Why are you so unhappy as to sit on your perches spitting at the reality of humanity and imagining that everyone in the army is out of step except you guys, and the Chickenhawk, of course ?

Don't you realise what idiots you make yourselves look ? And I know you're an intelligent man Trev.

12:13 AM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

Eh?

7:17 PM  
Anonymous Steve Nice Guy Northland said...

A weak "Eh?" just not good enough honey........c'mon, get mouthy, smell a commie........

11:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Steve, lay off the drugs. Or alternatively, up your dosage.

Anything so long as you stop talking about things you know nothing about.

EXOCET

8:03 AM  
Blogger Sam Buchanan said...

Wow! Any "organised intimidation" is now terrorism!

So if a cop or a security guard tries to look threatening I can get them booked under the Suppression of Terrorism Act? How about a couple of school bullies who've conspired together? Or a school teacher who threatens a detention if the class doesn't bahave?

Terrorists all of them, probably Marxists too, crypto-communists I'm sure, hippies, dole bludgers, beatniks, crawling up my legs... 'Scuse me, gotta go chew on the rug now.

11:12 AM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

I'm quoting a dictionary Sam-what's your definition of terrorism?

11:50 AM  
Blogger Sam Buchanan said...

How does this sound?

Terrorism – The use or threat of lethal force to induce fear in a group of civilians in order to achieve a political end.

5:01 PM  
Blogger Trevor Loudon said...

Good definition Sam-the difference is in the word lethal-I don't think life has to be at risk to classify an action as terrorism.

If Mugabe's thugs started burning buildings on a white owned farm to get the owner to move on, I'd call that terrorism.

9:49 AM  
Blogger Sam Buchanan said...

Given the actions of Mugabe's mobs, I'd say that in that situation there is an understood threat that actions would escalate to murder if the farmer (black or white) didn't move on.

Without that threat, I don't think property damage ranks as terrorism.

5:34 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home