This is a disgrace! I thought you supported property rights, not theft. I'm disappointed in you, Trevor.
Supporting a pro-theft communist campaign like this one is not something I thought you'd stoop to. Please investigate the leadership of this Creative (so-called) "Freedom" Foundation - I would put money on the watermelon greens like Locke and Bradford being in there somewhere.
This is a disgrace! I thought you supported property rights, not theft. I'm disappointed in you, Trevor.
ReplyDeleteSupporting a pro-theft communist campaign like this one is not something I thought you'd stoop to. Please investigate the leadership of this Creative (so-called) "Freedom" Foundation - I would put money on the watermelon greens like Locke and Bradford being in there somewhere.
Don't be a dickhead anon.
ReplyDeleteThis is not an anti copyright campaign.
There are two issues-what the Americans call "fair use"-the ability to quote selected passages of someone's work to make a point.
This bill may hamper that ability.
Second-ISPs will be required to enforce a law and make judgements (with no appeal) when that is the proper role and responsibility of the state.
This is totally unacceptable to libertarian principles.